Goodreads
Apparently, Goodreads is very controversial. I had no idea! Shannon Hale discussed it at length. Betsy Bird addressed it. Michael Stearns blogged about it too. I'm sure there are plenty more, but that was enough to get me thinking. As always, there are so many sides to an issue, this one included.
I love Goodreads. LOVE it. I use it to keep track of what I've read and what I want to read. It helps me find good books to read, lets me know about new books (and old books too!) I haven't heard about. It's like a book club of my writer friends and librarians and fellow book lovers who live all around the country- we read, we share, we discuss. Book clubs discuss the merits of books, don't they? They discuss pros and cons, what they liked and didn't like. What they learned. How it made them feel. How it enriched their life, or didn't.
Most of the complaints against Goodreads seem to be that unqualified people slander books in public there. As in any internet forum, UNFORTUNATELY, there are those who feel the need to do that sort of thing. I don't. I hope that my comments are constructive and informative, I hope I help people find good books to read. I have opinions and I like to share them. If I cheerlead all books, I don't think people can trust me. I don't think it will give them a sense of my true taste- hearing what a person doesn't like about a book I think is often more telling about them than hearing that they "loved" every book. I'm not mean and I try to balance out every comment I make- point out the good as well as the bad. I probably hedge more on the side of being nice and often hold back to some degree. And if I'm just not sure what to say, I don't say anything at all- no comment, no stars. It wouldn't be fair. I'm not a professional reviewer, I'm just a reader.
I admit to actively disliking two specific children's books (and there's one running a close third) and I'm willing to discuss those books with anyone at any time- I didn't go out of my way to malign them on Goodreads, I star-rated them and I stand by my dislike of them although I know many people love them- and I don't hold that against them :) I do plenty of cheerleading on my website and here on my blog (see post below for example) about the many, many books I do love- if it was all love, all the time, wouldn't it just seem unrealistic? I feel Goodreads is the perfect place to discuss all the merits of books.
Now, as an author, what do I think of Goodreads? I think it's an invaluable resource. There are some negative reviews of my book on there. One even made fun of my name!! And as I have more books come out, I will have more, I am sure. I read the negative reviews, I bemoan them a bit, then I move on. I don't expect everyone to love my work- not even other author friends. Just because they like me doesn't mean they like my writing. Do I love reading the bad comments? No. Do I respect everyone's right to his or her own opinion? YES. Do I worry that other people might not look at things the same way I do? Yes. Do I worry that some editor might read a negative comment I made about a book they edited and decide they would never want to work with me because of it? Sort of, but to be honest, I probably wouldn't get along with that person anyway! I like people who stick up for what they believe in and don't hold what other people believe in against them. So I'm respectful, but honest. I admire those qualities in others and try to exhibit them myself. I'm not trashing authors or editors or publishing houses, I'm discussing their books. I'm not on Goodreads to do anything but talk about books.
So, that's my official position on Goodreads. I don't usually go out of my way to solicit comments on this blog- I'm too introverted to do that! But I would love to hear from anyone who has an opinion on this topic that they want to share with me- pro, con, whatever. I'm curious, as I was just astounded to see the negative backlash out there against Goodreads. I like to hear all sides of an issue. I sometimes hear something to change my mind! And I promise, I won't hold your opinion against you.
:)
I love Goodreads. LOVE it. I use it to keep track of what I've read and what I want to read. It helps me find good books to read, lets me know about new books (and old books too!) I haven't heard about. It's like a book club of my writer friends and librarians and fellow book lovers who live all around the country- we read, we share, we discuss. Book clubs discuss the merits of books, don't they? They discuss pros and cons, what they liked and didn't like. What they learned. How it made them feel. How it enriched their life, or didn't.
Most of the complaints against Goodreads seem to be that unqualified people slander books in public there. As in any internet forum, UNFORTUNATELY, there are those who feel the need to do that sort of thing. I don't. I hope that my comments are constructive and informative, I hope I help people find good books to read. I have opinions and I like to share them. If I cheerlead all books, I don't think people can trust me. I don't think it will give them a sense of my true taste- hearing what a person doesn't like about a book I think is often more telling about them than hearing that they "loved" every book. I'm not mean and I try to balance out every comment I make- point out the good as well as the bad. I probably hedge more on the side of being nice and often hold back to some degree. And if I'm just not sure what to say, I don't say anything at all- no comment, no stars. It wouldn't be fair. I'm not a professional reviewer, I'm just a reader.
I admit to actively disliking two specific children's books (and there's one running a close third) and I'm willing to discuss those books with anyone at any time- I didn't go out of my way to malign them on Goodreads, I star-rated them and I stand by my dislike of them although I know many people love them- and I don't hold that against them :) I do plenty of cheerleading on my website and here on my blog (see post below for example) about the many, many books I do love- if it was all love, all the time, wouldn't it just seem unrealistic? I feel Goodreads is the perfect place to discuss all the merits of books.
Now, as an author, what do I think of Goodreads? I think it's an invaluable resource. There are some negative reviews of my book on there. One even made fun of my name!! And as I have more books come out, I will have more, I am sure. I read the negative reviews, I bemoan them a bit, then I move on. I don't expect everyone to love my work- not even other author friends. Just because they like me doesn't mean they like my writing. Do I love reading the bad comments? No. Do I respect everyone's right to his or her own opinion? YES. Do I worry that other people might not look at things the same way I do? Yes. Do I worry that some editor might read a negative comment I made about a book they edited and decide they would never want to work with me because of it? Sort of, but to be honest, I probably wouldn't get along with that person anyway! I like people who stick up for what they believe in and don't hold what other people believe in against them. So I'm respectful, but honest. I admire those qualities in others and try to exhibit them myself. I'm not trashing authors or editors or publishing houses, I'm discussing their books. I'm not on Goodreads to do anything but talk about books.
So, that's my official position on Goodreads. I don't usually go out of my way to solicit comments on this blog- I'm too introverted to do that! But I would love to hear from anyone who has an opinion on this topic that they want to share with me- pro, con, whatever. I'm curious, as I was just astounded to see the negative backlash out there against Goodreads. I like to hear all sides of an issue. I sometimes hear something to change my mind! And I promise, I won't hold your opinion against you.
:)



















